Car Accidents Archives - May Herr & Grosh LLP

“ONLY PAY FOR WHAT YOU NEED!”: What does that even mean within the context of purchasing auto insurance?

July 2, 2024

a person signing auto insurance policy paperwork

If you, like me, are in the habit of watching television on a fairly regular basis, no doubt you have been bombarded with commercials for automobile insurance. One of those carriers seems to have fallen into a particularly successful ad campaign that always concludes with the catch phrase “Only pay for what you need.” The … Read more

How Does Pennsylvania’s “No Fault” Law Affect You as a Driver or Passenger?

September 25, 2023

Two people, a man in the background and a woman with her hand on the back of her neck in the foreground, are standing in front of a car accident, looking at their phone screens.

Navigating the complexities of the Pennsylvania no fault law can be daunting, especially when dealing with the aftermath of a car accident. This law, also known as the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), significantly influences how accident victims recover compensation for their injuries and damages from car crashes. Understanding its nuances is essential for … Read more

Learn About Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Coverage and Why It Is a Must-Have

October 19, 2023June 30, 2023

A blonde woman sits on the ground, on the phone, next to her car with its rear end smashed in.

Navigating the car insurance market can be a daunting and stressful task, particularly when attempting to find the right coverage tailored to your unique needs. With numerous options available, each promising various levels of protection at different price points, it is easy to feel overwhelmed by many policies, deductibles, and premiums. As you explore your options, remember that your ultimate goal is to obtain dependable and comprehensive coverage that safeguards you, your passengers, and your vehicle in case of an accident or unexpected events.

When shopping for a car insurance policy, you may want to consider uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage, which provides additional financial protection if you are involved in an accident with an uninsured driver. By carefully evaluating your personal requirements and comparing different insurance providers, you can successfully traverse the intricate world of car insurance and secure peace of mind while on the road.

12 Steps to Protect Yourself After a Hit and Run in PA

May 25, 2023

wrecked car with other stopped cars in the background

Imagine you’ve just been involved in a car accident in Pennsylvania. Usually, you would call the police and exchange driver’s licenses, car insurance, and contact information. But this is different. The driver who hit you has fled the scene. If you have sustained injuries or your vehicle has been damaged, you will likely be considered … Read more

What Do I Need to Bring When Speaking to a Car Accident Lawyer in PA?

March 1, 2023

An image of a car accident between a black SUV and a gray car.

Accidents are harrowing events and can be traumatic. Speaking with a car accident lawyer in PA after you have been in a collision can help you navigate this difficult time effectively to ensure you get the justice you deserve. It can be confusing and challenging to keep track of everything you need when you are … Read more

Accident Prevention Advice from a Lancaster Truck Accident Attorney

October 10, 2022

Have you been a victim of an accident involving a semi-truck or tractor-trailer? Or are you interested in learning how to be proactive and help prevent tractor-trailer accidents—as the operator of a passenger or commercial vehicle? Our Lancaster truck accident attorneys are sharing recommendations from our law firm and the Pennsylvania State Police to help … Read more

Sovereign Immunity: The King Can Do Wrong

April 25, 2023October 23, 2018

The principal of sovereign immunity, which prohibits the suing of the state or political subdivisions (boroughs, cities, school districts, etc.), has been around for a long time and grew out of the old English theory of “the King can do no wrong.” That got tossed out by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 1978 and after a couple of years of proving that the King could do a lot of wrong, the Legislature passed two laws. One gave immunity back to the state with certain exceptions and the other gave immunity back to political subdivisions, also with certain exceptions. These exceptions allow the injured to sue the state or city.

In the last 20 years, rulings of the Commonwealth Court (which hears all appeals concerning the state or political subdivisions) have greatly narrowed two of these exceptions. One says that you can sue the state for a dangerous condition of realty owned by PennDOT, and the other is for the operation of a motor vehicle by a political subdivision.

Both of these exceptions were restored to their proper breadth in two recent cases by the Supreme Court.

Knee Injuries Greatly Increase the Development of Arthritis

August 12, 2021November 14, 2017

Herr & Low has represented injured people for over 30 years and that long view informs what we do. We know, from clients who have kept in touch or returned to see us later, that an injury to a joint will cause problems down the road. A report in the New York Times now gives … Read more

Birchfield and Blood Draws – New Developments in DUI law

April 25, 2023November 21, 2016

The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Birchfield v. North Dakota deemed warrantless blood draws in driving under the influence arrests unconstitutional. This has far-reaching consequences in Pennsylvania, a so-called “implied consent” state, in which a motorist is deemed to have consented to a test of his blood or breath in the event of a suspected DUI.

Prior to the Supreme Court’s Birchfield decision, anyone stopped for a suspected DUI who refused a blood draw would potentially be subject to increased criminal penalties as if he or she had registered a blood alcohol level of .16% or higher, the highest tier for DUI sentencing purposes. Warnings given to motorists made this clear in advising of their “right” to refusal. In sentencing terms, refusals for a first offense called for a mandatory 72 hours incarceration and a mandatory minimum fine of $1,000. Both minimum and maximum penalties increased dramatically for second and subsequent offenses.

Textalyzers: New Technology May Raise Privacy Concerns

April 25, 2023May 27, 2016

It’s no secret these days that smartphones play a major role in our lives. Look around you at any restaurant, grocery store, or simply walking down the street and you’ll likely see dozens of people, heads down, intent on their screens. Increasingly, states are passing laws to make sure that this same scene isn’t repeated … Read more

We Are Here

Contact Us

Top Rated

Practice Areas